Thursday, 03 Sha'aban 1447 | 2026/01/22
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

Tyrannical Regime Imprisoned Five Shababs of Hizb ut Tahrir on False Accusations of Preparation for Seizing Power by Force in Russia

On 21 November 2013, in Chelyabinsk the tyrannical regime imprisoned five sons from the Islamic Ummah, who would not accept a depressive condition of its mother and actively worked for its mother i.e. Islamic Ummah could rise from its knees and get rid of the shackles of Kufr and ignorance. The members of Hizb ut Tahrir: Marat Bazarbaev born in 1976, Rushat Valiev born in 1982, Rinat Galiullin born in 1978...

Read more...

Australian Spying on Indonesia Act of Hostility

Documented revelations have shown that Australian intelligence agencies were spying, through Australian embassies in Indonesia, on Indonesian leaders in 2009. The phones of President Yudhoyono, his wife, and many in his inner circle were tapped. Indonesia has recalled its ambassador to Australia and demanded an apology, dismissing Prime Minister Tony Abbott's response to the revelations as inadequate.

Read more...

US Politicians Exploit Afghan Women's Rights Yet Again as a Tool to Justify Continued Occupation of the Country

On the 18th November 2013 media outlets such as Associated Press and ABC News reported that US Secretary of State John Kerry and his predecessor, Hillary Clinton, stated that Afghanistan is reaching a turning point that will be critical to maintaining advances made by its women over the last decade. Clinton mentioned, "the hard-fought gains that women and children have been able to enjoy" while Kerry commented that Afghan women and girls had made great progress since 2001...

Read more...

Answer to the Question Regarding the Divine Reason (‘Illa) of Alcohol (Khamr) and its Prohibition To: Fahmi Barkous (Translated)

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Question

"Things are permitted in origin unless there is an evidence of prohibition". Money is a thing, there is no mention of evidence that prohibits it, and therefore, it remains in its original state of being permitted. For example: someone steals money, the ruling on the action of stealing is prohibition and the sin lies with the one who committed the action and all that follows in terms of the punishment. As for the money in terms of money, it remains as its origin which is permitted and must be returned back to its owner. This is the ruling on anything stolen regardless of the fact that it was transferred (from one place to another) or not, the money generally remains permitted regardless of the action connected to it as long as there is no restriction by evidences. There is no issue for the person if the money is taken from him as a gift or present, or nafaqa (money he is obliged to spend) because the prohibited action is not connected to the one who undertook the action only ...and Allah knows best.


«حُرِّمَتِ الْخَمْرُ بِعَيْنِهَا» "khamr was prohibited for its origin", the ‘ain of khamr (alcohol) is its origin, i.e. it is prohibited because it is khamr, i.e. its prohibition is because of its origin and the rules the rules related to it e.g. its seller, drinker...etc, but how is the prohibition of money, the transferred and that which is not transferred linked with the Khamr and its sale? Are the Khamr and its prohibition a divine reason (‘illa) for the prohibition of the money? If so, then by Qiyas (analogy) it would not be permissible to use the glass after using it for Khamr, or the truck that carried the Khamr because they share the same ‘illa?

Please clarify and shed some light on the issue, Barak Allahu Feek.

Answer

Yes, "Things are permitted in origin unless there is an evidence of prohibition". As for your question on ‘Illa of Khamr (alcohol) and its prohibition and about the truck that transfers it and the glass which was filled with Khamr, the issue is as following:

«مَا أَسْكَرَ كَثِيرُهُ، فَقَلِيلُهُ حَرَامٌ»

The Prophet (saw) said from what Abu Dawoud extracted from Jabir bin Abdullah: "What intoxicates in a large amount, it small amount is prohibited."

What is clear from this hadeeth is the absence of ‘illa (cause), intoxication is not ‘illa, the evidence for this is that if a small amount is consumed it does not lead to intoxication of the drinker but it is still regarded as prohibited and he is deserving of the punishment. The hadeeth prohibits the small amount if the large amount leads to the state of intoxication; drinking a small amount therefore is prohibited.
Also there is no mention of the ‘ila regarding the ten categories:

«لَعَنَ اللَّهُ الْخَمْرَ، وَلَعَنَ سَاقِيهَا، وَشَارِبَهَا، وَعَاصِرَهَا، وَمُعْتَصِرَهَا، وَحَامِلَهَا، وَالْمَحْمُولَةَ إِلَيْهِ، وَبَايِعِهَا وَمُبْتَاعَهَا، وَآكِلَ ثَمَنِهَا»

In the Mustadrak, Hakim extracted from the two Sahih from Abdullah Bin Ummar, from his father that the Prophet (saw) said: "Allah has cursed Khamr (alcohol), its server, its drinker, its presser, the one for whom it is pressed, the one who conveys it, and the one to whom it is conveyed, its seller, its buyer, the one who enjoys profit from its price."

What is clear from the hadeeth is that there is no mention of ‘illa, therefore Qiyas (analogy) is not applicable between this and other issues.
Based on this, any drink that leads to intoxication is khamr; they are equal in prohibition whether in small or large amounts. The ten categories mentioned in the hadeeth are prohibited without ‘illa. But this ruling applies to the Mukalaf (accountable), so it is implemented on the truck driver but not on the truck used to transfer the alcohol, nor on the glass that was filled with it. The rule related to khamr is not the same as the truck or the glass. Al-Tabarani extracted in Al-Kabeer from Abi Tha'laba Al-Khushani that he said:


قَالَ: أَتَيْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ: ... وَأَنَا فِي أَرْضِ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ وَهُمْ يَأْكُلُونَ فِي آنِيَتِهِمْ الْخِنْزِيرَ وَيَشْرَبُونَ فِيهَا الْخَمْرَ فَآكُلُ فِيهَا وَأَشْرَبُ...؟ ثُمَّ قَالَ صلى الله عليه وسلم: ...وَإِنْ وَجَدْتَ عَنْ آنِيَةِ الْكُفَّارِ غِنًى فَلَا تَأْكُلْ فِيهَا، وَإِنْ لَم تَجِدْ غِنًى فَارْحَضْهَا بِالْمَاءِ رَحْضًا شَدِيدًا ثُمَّ كُلْ فِيهَا

"I came to the Prophet (saw) and said: "O Messenger of Allah... and I am in the land of the people of the book and they eat pork with their utensils and drink khamr, can I drink and eat from them?" The Prophet (saw) said:


«...وَإِنْ وَجَدْتَ عَنْ آنِيَةِ الْكُفَّارِ غِنًى فَلَا تَأْكُلْ فِيهَا، وَإِنْ لَم تَجِدْ غِنًى فَارْحَضْهَا بِالْمَاءِ رَحْضًا شَدِيدًا ثُمَّ كُلْ فِيهَا»


"if you can spare yourself from eating from the utensils of the Kufar then do so, if you cannot, then wash them vigorously with water, then eat from them."


I.e. if you were in need for them and could not find other utensils, then wash them very well.

 

Your brother,
Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al- Rashtah

 

 

The link to the answer from the Ameer's Facebook page

Read more...

Headline News 21/11/2013

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

 

Headlines:

  • Iran Deal Still on Table as Geneva Talks Resume
  • US Troops to Stay in Afghanistan Till 2024
  • Indonesia Halts Australia Co-operation amid Spying Row


Details:

Iran Deal Still on Table as Geneva Talks Resume

On the eve of the latest round of nuclear talks, UK Prime Minister David Cameron phoned Iran's President Hassan Rouhani. It was the first such conversation between British and Iranian leaders for more than 10 years. It follows a similar phone conversation in September between President Rouhani and US President Barack Obama - the most high-level Iran-US contact since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. It is clear that the election of Hassan Rouhani has changed the diplomatic atmosphere dramatically.  As a result, the speed of talks about the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme has increased. The world powers and Iran are about to start their third round of discussions in five weeks. Negotiators here in Geneva may hope to approach or even reach an interim agreement during their next three days of talks. Diplomats decline to reveal the details of their demands and proposals. But a potential first-step deal may include some of the following elements: Iran would agree to limit its enrichment of uranium; to convert some of its stockpile of medium enriched uranium; to limit the types of centrifuges it uses for enrichment, and to give greater access to international inspectors. These steps would make it harder for Iran to proceed towards building a nuclear weapon - a process known as "breakout". Iran strongly denies any ambition to develop an actual bomb. In exchange for taking some or all of the above steps, the world powers say they are prepared to ease some sanctions on Iran. This may take the form of allowing the Islamic Republic access to around $10bn (£6bn) in frozen assets. But negotiators appeared to get stuck on two particular issues. Firstly, France called for greater restrictions on a heavy water reactor at Arak which, when finished, would be able to produce plutonium.  Secondly, Iran reportedly insisted on a recognition of what it believes is its right to enrich uranium. Article 4 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty guarantees countries the right to develop the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. But the text of the treaty does not expressly refer to a right to enrich uranium. Members of the US Congress, in particular, are sceptical of a deal with Iran. And Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly opposes any agreement which would allow Iran to keep its nuclear programme. He has accused the world powers of offering the Islamic Republic the deal of the century. [Source: BBC News]

 

US Troops to Stay in Afghanistan Till 2024

The United States and Afghanistan reached a draft agreement on Wednesday laying out the terms under which US troops may stay beyond 2014, one day before Afghan elders are to debate the issue. A draft accord released by the Afghan government appears to meet US demands on such controversial issues as whether US troops would unilaterally conduct counterterrorism operations, enter Afghan homes or protect the country from outside attack. Without the accord, Washington has warned it could withdraw its troops by the end of next year and leave Afghan forces to fight a Taliban-led insurgency without their help. Thousands of Afghan dignitaries and elders are due to convene in a giant tent in the capital Kabul on Thursday to debate the fate of US forces after a 2014 drawdown of a multinational NATO force. "We have reached an agreement as to the final language of the bilateral security agreement that will be placed before the Loya Jirga tomorrow," US Secretary of State John Kerry told reporters in the US capital, referring to the gathering. The draft agreement is to take effect on January 1, 2015, and says it will remain in effect "until the end of 2024 and beyond, unless terminated." A senior US administration official said there has been no decision on the size of any post-2014 US force, however the administration does not foresee a residual force staying in Afghanistan until anywhere near 2024. Intense negotiations between Kabul and Washington have provoked frustration among the Afghan tribal and political elders who made perilous journeys from all over the country to the capital Kabul for a grand assembly to debate the pact. [Source: Reuters]

 

Indonesia Halts Australia Co-operation amid Spying Row

Indonesia has suspended co-ordinated military co-operation with Australia amid an ongoing row over reports Canberra spied on Jakarta officials. President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said the suspension included operations to stop people-smuggling, joint military exercises and intelligence exchange. The move came after Jakarta recalled its ambassador from Canberra on Monday. Reports of the spying allegations came out in Australian media from documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden. The leaked document showed that Australian spy agencies named Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, the first lady, the vice-president and other senior ministers as targets for telephone monitoring, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Guardian said. The alleged spying took place in 2009, under the previous government. Australia and Indonesia are key allies and trading partners. "It is not possible that we can continue our co-operation when we are still uncertain that there is no spying towards us," Mr Yudhoyono said. He added he would also write to Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to seek an official explanation over spying allegations. The decision came after Mr Yudhoyono met with top officials, including the recalled Indonesian ambassador to Australia, to discuss the country's relationship with one of its closest neighbours, reports say. "We're not only reviewing our co-operation with Australia, we're actually already implementing the downgrading of our bilateral relations with Australia," Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa also said on Wednesday. He added that Australia "must take concrete steps" to "repair the almost irreparable damage ". He added that the relationship between both countries was "not business as usual". [Source: BBC News]

Read more...

The Answer to the Question The Problems in the Chinese Economy (Translated)  

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

 

Question:

On Wednesday 13/11/2013 the Chinese President Xi Jinping said that "China will step ahead with reforms to solve the economic problems but these reforms require careful planning and cannot be achieved between night and day..." This was in the end of a meeting held by the Chinese leadership starting on Saturday 9/11/2013 that lasted four days. This meeting was held after seven explosions took place on November 6, 2013 in one of the regional headquarters of the Chinese Communist Party - the ruling party in China. These explosions happened one week after a car crashed into a crowd of people and caught fire in a street close to Tiananmen Square, the great public square in Beijing that is considered the symbolic heart of the Chinese capital. And the Question: We hear that the Chinese economy is at an apex, so what does it mean when the Chinese leadership meets to find solutions to the economic problems? And is there a relationship between the explosions and the meeting of Chinese officials to study economic issues? May Allah (swt) reward you.

 

Answer:

  1. Yes, there is a relationship, even if the government, as always, hastened to say: "the government blames what it calls Islamic extremists", to divert attention from the faltering economic situation that is pushing the Chinese people, particularly in the countryside and the midland, to misery and hardship, which will then push them to violent demonstrations to bring the state's attention to the economic suffering.
  2. These incidents are considered a part of an underlying political trend that indicates that China is facing deep internal troubles, which will affect their management of foreign policy. In 2005 China dealt with 87,000 cases of social unrest, including general discontent, and demonstrations, and internal conflict. In 2010, 180,000 demonstrations, protests and other social incidents happened in China. In other words, the unrest is increasing...
  3. The free economic zones in China (SEZs), which were the major source of the fast growth in China, were all set up in the eastern coast of China, and everything that comes out of the production lines is carried on ships and exported to the world. As a result the coastal region was linked to the international economy; and saw most of the rapid growth in China, as it also created a new generation of elite, all at the expense of the rest of China. The rest of China is still mainly agricultural, with minimal infrastructure and its inhabitants living lives of poverty. According to the international study of the distribution of wealth carried out by the Boston Consulting Group in 2008, 0.2% of the population in China control 70% of the wealth in China. And the effect of this poor distribution is compounded by physical abuse, imprisonment, lax labour laws, and extremely low wages, and the Chinese government's failure to heed the economic needs of most of its citizens.
  4. The Chinese economic model that relies on low wages and high foreign exports is faltering now; and the international economic crisis in 2008 completely exposed this fact. A number of economic experts consider the Chinese economy to be in distress. The recipient of the Nobel Prize in economics, Paul Krugman said, "The signs are now unmistakable: China is in big trouble. We're not talking about some minor setback along the way, but something more fundamental. The country's whole way of doing business, the economic system that has driven three decades of incredible growth, has reached its limits. You could say that the Chinese model is about to hit its Great Wall, and the only question now is just how bad the crash will be." (Hitting China's Wall, Paul Krugman, The New York Times, 18 July 2013) Stratfor also said: "Major shifts underway in the Chinese economy that Stratfor has forecast and discussed for years have now drawn the attention of the mainstream media. Many have asked when China would find itself in an economic crisis, to which we have answered that China has been there for awhile -- something not widely recognized outside China, and particularly not in the United States. A crisis can exist before it is recognized. The admission that a crisis exists is a critical moment, because this is when most others start to change their behavior in reaction to the crisis. The question we had been asking was when the Chinese economic crisis would finally become an accepted fact, thus changing the global dynamic." (The End of the Chinese Economic Miracle, Stratfor, 23 July 2013)
  5. In the last ten years China has begun to progress in the capitalist approach to economic growth which means that economic growth is measured by an increase in production without considering distribution, so if production increases that means that the economy is strong and advanced even if it is all the fortune of a small group and the rest of the people live miserably... in other words concentration is on an increase in production without concentrating on fair distribution. If China continues on this communist/capitalist hybrid approach it will be afflicted with what affected the Soviet Union, which collapsed when it attempted to mix communism and capitalism, and became as a crow that tried to imitate another bird in the way it walks, and could not and ended up forgetting how it used to walk! And this is how China might become... Unless it realizes the source of its problems and solves them.
  6. China would be able to save itself from this crisis if it can transform from this hybrid economy, and stop focusing on high exports without first focusing on local demand by its people, and meeting the needs of this people. Otherwise, 948 million of the 1.3 billion of the people of China will continue to live on less than five dollars a day, and the wealth will remain concentrated in a small group that exploits the energy of the poor labourers, and then meeting the needs of a majority of the people is elusive, and production is controlled by a small portion of people who export production outside, so increase in production appears, but an increase in poverty in the lives of most of the people pushes them to demonstration and unrest... Zhou Xiaosheng, a distinguished professor in the Institute of Law and Sociology at Renmin University in China, explained the reality of China saying: "Do not forget that the current success of China is built on the fact that 300 million people exploit one billion low wage labourers. And the judicial system is unfair, and the unjust distribution of wealth makes the challenges greater."
  7. China should not follow in the footsteps of the capitalist West and attribute all demonstrations and unrest to "Islamic extremism" instead of looking for the roots of the crisis of its hybrid economy that depends on increasing production and exporting it, so production increases in volume but poor distribution gets worse, and the number of people in poverty increases, and therefore demonstrations increase... We warn China that if it continues with this "Communocapitalist" economic policy it will follow the Soviets, and become a happening of the past...

We do not say to China to implement Islam they will thrive... and this is because this implementation requires the Islamic creed first, and it is not found with them... but we tell them to not imitate the capitalist West by focusing on increasing production without fair distribution by meeting the needs of a majority of the people that are affected by poverty. Otherwise, an increase in demonstrations is expected due to the dire economic and intellectual situation and not due to so called Islamic extremism as is promoted by the West... Speaking of Islamic extremism falls under political indictment, and it is a prelude to the serious indictment of China due to its occupation of eastern Turkistan by iron and fire, but all these deceptions and guile and attempts at changing reality will not make the Muslims forget China's occupation of Turkistan. Indeed it will return, Allah (swt) willing, sooner or later to the Islamic Ummah.

((وَلَتَعْلَمُنَّ نَبَأَهُ بَعْدَ حِين))

"And you will know its message after a while" [Sad: 88]

 

14th Muharram 1435 AH

17/11/2013 CE

Read more...

Imran Khan - A New Jockey for America's Horse, Democracy

  • Published in Politics
  •   |  

The desire for real change is stronger than ever before in Pakistan. The people desire the end of the crippling American influence and a return to Islam. More and more people realize that democracy itself is responsible for the American influence and is an obstacle to the return to Islam. A golden chance arises for politicians who would come forward with a strong agenda grounded in Islam. However, politicians who adhere to democracy are never going to change the status quo. They may play to the desires of the people but they will never deliver what they promise through democracy. Thus they offer nothing new or any real change to the corrupt Kayani-Sharif regime. And post-elections, Imran Khan is proving that hope in his party is no hope at all.

As a democrat, seeking his way into the current set-up, Imran Khan, like others before him, depends on seasoned democrats who have secured American interests for years. This is why the party of Imran Khan has made room for Sardar Asif Ahmed Ali, Khursheed Mahmood Qusuri and Shah Mahmood Qusuri, all ex-foreign ministers who furthered American interests whilst they were in ruling. Such foreign ministers of Pakistan are appointed after close vetting by US officials and lawmakers and once a go-ahead is given by the US State Department. They have been the trusted agents of the America and are essential for future implementation of American plans. Khursheed Qasuri was Musharraf's foreign minister and was defender of the war of terror throughout his tenure. He was the architect of the Kashmir sell out plan in the name of "self-governance." He famously remarked that India and Pakistan have reached a settlement of Kashmir and only 4-5 people are aware of the final shape of the plan. As a democrat he proved his loyalty to America and treachery to Muslims. And Shah Mahmood Quraishi played a similar role. It is ironic that upon his appointment in the foreign ministry that Imran Khan's party itself raised objection. Shireen Mazari, a staunch nationalist, then in PTI, remarked that the "American dream team" has settled in the foreign ministry. And Sardar Assef has been no different. The inclusion of American agents in Imran Khan's party is no surprise as anyone who seeks power in democracy must prove their capability to secure colonialist interests.

Increasing the chances of coming to power means that in addition to seasoned American men there are other politicians who will follow these agents for cheap personal interest. Such vision-less "lota" politicians from the PPP, PML-N and Musharraf's former party, the PML-Q, have joined the party of Imran Khan. About 30 politicians from PML-Q  including Awais Leghari, Jamal Leghari, Ghulam Sarwar Khan and Sikandar Hayyat Khan Bosan have joined the PTI. The English daily The News has produced a report stating, "Names of the establishment's Q-Leaguers who joined the PTI in last few months have already been published in national press, show that more than 90 percent of the new entrants in Lahore, Chakwal and all other major cities of Punjab are known Musharraf's men." Former foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, has been made Vice-chairman of the PTI. The inclusion of such people is a clear indication that the economic and foreign policy will remain unchanged. The stage is set for America, her men and corrupt yes-men within the political and military leadership to work with Imran, ensuring their interests are preserved.

Of course the people sense that something is wrong as they have been bitten many times before by democracy. Indeed, Imran Khan's inclusions were met with opposition even from his party workers. Imran Khan was forced to promise his party workers that tickets will not be awarded to these "corrupt" but "electable" politicians, in an effort to appease them. But these were merely words and the reality is that the party of Imran Khan is now a stable for America's horses. Then Imran was reduced to consoling the workers by asking them to ignore what has happened and look forward to the elections. But, once the Imran Khan party won in the province of Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa, the American jockeys were prominent.

So it is inevitable that Imran Khan will never be able to deliver upon his election promises. The US Ambassador described democracy as its horse and any one who sits atop of it is merely a jockey. Now that Imran Khan is in ruling in KPK it can be clearly seen. Take education as an example. Previously Imran Khan said that he will impose an education emergency allocating 4% GDP to education, once they form the government. Now, after the formation of government in KPK, Imran Khan broke his promise and added the pension and salaries budget to the education budget so that he can claimed that the education budget has been raised manifold. Though in reality it was raised from 65 to 66 billion rupees only. So much for his tall claims on education. As for self-reliance and economic independence from America, Imran Khan claimed to work for self-reliance of the government and always called against US loan and grants. However, currently KPK is largest recipient of the USAID (500 million dollar) and the KPK budget specifies a significant sum to be collected from foreign donors (35 billion rupees). As for breaking of promises regarding drone attacks and the NATO supply line. It is Imran Khan's provincial government who, instead of stopping the supply line, is providing security to the American and NATO containers which contain weapons, explosives, wine, pork, oil and other supplies for Western forces on Muslim Lands. Thus Imran Khan, like Zardari and Nawaz Sharif, is actually the "chowkidar" of the American war supply. Security to the NATO supply is secured by KPK police, which is directly under the provincial government. Not a single step was taken to obstruct it. Contrast this to Imran Khan's pre-election stance. He held a protest "dharna" where he was bent upon stopping it, when he was not in power. Regarding drone attacks, Imran Khan now seeks refuge behind "It's a federal issue", when he raised no such excuse during elections as he competed for power in KPK.

As if this were all not enough to raise alarm bells in the minds of those who are setting themselves up for more disappointment through democracy, consider Imran's stance on India. Imran Khan fully endorses all American position on Kashmir. Imran Khan lend full support to "Aman ki Asha" for the Akhand Bharat project in which the Hindus will secure dominance over Muslims through a Greater India. Imran Khan supports the "self governance" to carve up and sell off Kashmir. Imran Khan wants to sideline Kashmir, calling for "putting Kashmir on back burner". Imran Khan condemns armed resistance to brutal Indian occupying forces as "terrorism." Compare this to his stance before snuggling up to America. In 9th June 2002, Imran khan said, "Any deviation from the stated stance on the right of self-determination for the people of Kashmir would not guarantee peace in the region on a long-term basis." He also said, "if the freedom struggle by Tamil Tigers, the Palestinians and the Chechens could not be suppressed despite the use of military might, the indigenous freedom movement of Kashmiri people can also go on indefinitely in spite of Indian army's repressive actions and pressures applied by the international community."

As for Afghanistan, Imran Khan openly announced in his Lahore Jalsa that he will support "US exit plan" from Afghanistan, a plan designed by Obama as a cover for retaining a permanent US presence in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Under this plan American will maintain 20,000 soldiers and 100,000 security contractor (another name for soldiers) in nine bases in Afghanistan and around 7,000 Raymond Davis network agents in the world's second largest American embassy in Islamabad. Interestingly, Imran Khan never objected to the "mini-Pentagon" US embassy in the heart of our capital. And that is why the then US ambassador Cameron Munter, in his interview to BBC on 10th July, 2012, disclosed; "I have met Imran Khan and Nawaz Sharif both, and both have assured me that they are pro-American."

As a democrat, Imran Khan has allowed himself to be used by America's small club of agents embedded within our political and military leadership. Till 2011, US was interested in an operation on both sides of the border (under the famous Obama "surge" plan). And then after the end of 2011, US wanted to cut deals across the borders with "moderate" Taliban to secure a partial withdrawal, leaving behind a permanent US presence. And to create environment in the favor these talks traitors in the military leadership, particularly General Kiyani, and Ahmed Shuja Pasha cut a deal with Imran Khan. Subsequently, Imran Khan met with the US ambassador in General Pasha's presence and then visited the US State Department to agree on details. And then Imran Khan was launched to build him as America's new jockey. Media coverage was showered on PTI. Even the preparation of their gatherings was being covered 24/7 on private channels, what to talk about the gatherings.

In all, Imran Khan "change" agenda is similar to the "change" agenda advocated by Obama in the US, whereby, certain operational changes to achieve the very same goal were packaged as "change agenda". Imran Khan is no different. His "change" agenda is the same liberal market capitalist ideology as was successively followed by all the rulers of Pakistan. Fiat currency, interest based economy, privatization, imposing cruel taxes on all the population, western liberties, symbolic Islamic injunctions to appease the religious masses, subjugating international relation to imperialist UN and interest of the superpower (as will be explained later in the article) and other capitalist colonial agenda.

Thus Imran Khan has squandered and wasted any chance of good standing for himself and good for this nation, just like Nawaz Sharif, Zardari, and Kayani. Now those who still have not woken up are defensive saying that Imran Khan "may have problem" but "he is better than others." Its time to wake up!

Imran Khan will only be supported by America and its men as long as he fits the US plan. And he will be thrown off the horse of democracy when he sidesteps like Morsi in Egypt. Muslims must understand that Islam is the only salvation of the Muslims. Any partial solution of mixing Islam with other ideologies is bound to fail. Moreover, democracy is a system that binds even the sincere one to falsehood and corruption. It forces the sincere politician to compromise on principals and Islam. It forces compromises and does not allow enough power to an individual or party to make the changes that our Deen mandates. Islamic system is Khilafah "Caliphate", a system designed by the supreme where Muslims gives bayaa' of obedience to one Ameer under the condition that we will obey you as long as you implement Islam over us. The elected men and women of the Council of the Ummah are a key check to ensuring this.

When we have an Islamic system that encompasses all the affairs of the life - Khilafah "Caliphate"- why should we be fooled by those who cling to American and its idol democracy?  Khilafah "Caliphate" is the only system that will liberate the Ummah and not the western Kufr system of democracy. Only the Khilafah "Caliphate" can secure the rights of education and security for its citizens, regardless of their race, gender or religion, as it did for centuries previously. Indeed the world's elite used to flock to the Khilafah "Caliphate" for education and it was a sanctuary for the world's refugees. Only politicians who base their policies, agenda, constitution and ruling upon the firm foundation of Quran and Sunnah represent a hope for this Ummah.

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Talha Zubayr

Read more...

The Palestinian Authority, Accomplice to the Colonial Kuffar, Welcomes Corruptive Women's Activities while it Prohibits its Intellectual Opposition on the Basis of Islam

The Palestinian Authority, represented in Bethlehem by Governor Abdel Fattah Hamayel, prohibited the holding of a seminar of Hizb ut Tahrir in the An-Nurs Hall in the Municipality of Doha. This happened after an agreement with the municipality had occurred and invitations distributed to guests.

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands